Owing to the screen size of your device, you may obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).
owlcroft logo
An Owlcroft Company
web site.

 Click to 
 email us. 

If you like this site,
please post a link to it!

This is…

That Useful Wine Site

Search, or just roll your cursor over the colored boxes farther below.
Advertisements appear before actual Search results;
click the “x” to dismiss Search-results block.


  Site navigation:


  Site navigation:

Some Wine Reviews

Quick page jumps:

Some Wine Reviews
[Click here to jump direct to the reviewed-types list.]

Go fetch to me a pint o’wine…
    —“My Bonnie Mary”, Robert Burns

General Thoughts About These Reviews

What We Are Trying to Do

As we say elsewhere, our chief expertise, such as it may be, lies in discovering and extracting information from the huge but higgledy-piggledy pile of it that is the internet. Obviously, we have opinions of our own, but we have chosen to carefully separate them to here, away from our main compilations about wine types. We assert no special qualifications or reasons you should credit our reports above any others; but we do present those reports for whatever use you may find them to be.

In these reports, we do not restrict ourselves to either the list of types or the price restrictions of the main body of this site. What comes our way, we drink and review. If we bought the wine at retail, we will say so; if it was sent to us for review, we will say that, too. And so a word about review-sample bottles: if you are someone who wants to send us samples, please email us for delivery information; we prefer two bottles of any given wine for review, owing to bottle variation and the possibility of spoilage. Please understand that we make no promises as to speed of review, though we will do our best to be timely. And of course we cannot and do not promise glowing reviews.

We have excoriated wine rating systems that depend on elaborate or supposedly exact “scores”, and we do not use such scores in our own reports. What we are trying to do is convey what our feelings about a given wine were as we leisurely consumed a bottle of it. And that is another thing: while it may well be that trained expert tasters can catch the essence of a wine in a brief mouthful or two (then spat out), we feel strongly that unless one has gone through an entire bottle at the least (and two is better), it is presumptuous to try to discuss that wine’s assets and deficits. And “discuss” is what we try to do: articulate the experience of consuming that wine. As noted, we don’t use numerical scales, and we also try not to use arcane or specialist terms, or to say that the aroma reminds us of moss from the west side of a fir tree or a sheep’s hooves or any of the impossible nonsenses all too common in wine reviews.

If you want to sample what we mean by “impossible nonsenses”, you really must try this one out.

It is famously difficult to convey sense experiences to others, and especially so when we get away from sights and sounds, the experiences for which we have the widest vocabularies. The sorts of bizarre descriptors mocked above are not, or not all, pretension: they are attempts to articulate the ineffable. Often, with wines, the best approach is to try to compare it to some other reasonably well-known type, noting how and by how much it differs.

All that said, there are certain terms that are inescapable, and it helps if you have some definite idea of what each means. Here are links to some useful online discussions by recognized wine critics (since we see no point in trying to re-invent the wheel) on wine terminology:

Bottle Variation: an Important Consideration

Something else anyone reading these reviews should understand—and not just about our reviews but also your own tasting experiences—is that what is called “bottle variation” is real and a substantial issue. Two bottles from adjacent slots in the same case, even consumed close in time, can be (and often are) very different drinking experiences, and so in a sense neither really “represents” the wine. Those differences can arise from anything from the handling of the wine as it is bottled to shipping and storage differences to exact temperature and ambient conditions at serving, and even to what one had to eat at the last meal (much less with what foods one might be drinking the wines). All one can ever do is note that a bottle of this type came across as thus-and-so. The more bottles of a wine one has, the closer one can come to a description that fits the wine rather than the particular bottle, but that is not always feasible. And all that is without even considering vintage variations from year to year. So take our, your own, and any reviewers’ opinions with that warning: with the finest of abilities and the best of intentions, it is easy to mis-characterize a wine based on only one or two bottles of it.

The Index of Reviews

We index below by wine type (reds, whites, and others all intermixed alphabetically); each type link will take you to a page itemizing all reviews of wines of that type, each such review having its own page. At this stage, many wine types will have no reviews at all (remember, these are just reviews by us).





Disclaimers  |  Privacy Policy

owl logo This site is one of The Owlcroft Company family of web sites. Please click on the link (or the owl) to see a menu of our other diverse user-friendly, helpful sites. Pair Networks logo Like all our sites, this one is hosted at the highly regarded Pair Networks, whom we strongly recommend. We invite you to click on the Pair link or logo for more information on hosting by a first-class service.
(Note: All Owlcroft systems run on Ubuntu Linux and we heartily recommend it to everyone—click on the link for more information).

All content copyright © 2021 The Owlcroft Company
(excepting quoted material, which is believed to be Fair Use).

This web page is strictly compliant with the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Extensible HyperText Markup Language (XHTML) Protocol v1.0 (Transitional) and the W3C Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Protocol v3 — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!

This page was last modified on Monday, 25 October 2021, at 4:14 am Pacific Time.