Skip to main content 

Welcome to…
That Useful Wine Site

  Wine explained, clearly and helpfully, including critic-recommended specimens of each variety.

(click for menu)
bottles grapes glasses barrels
You are here:  Home  »  varietals  »  whites  »   ( = this page)
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  varietals  »  whites  »   ( = this page)

You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).
(Be aware that “sponsored” links to other sites will appear atop the actual results.)

Search term(s):





Welcome to That Useful Wine Site!

You have apparently come to this page from a link on a search engine or another site. If this is your first visit here, I much recommend that you take a few minutes to look over the introductory material accessible via the blue “Introductory” zone of the Site Menu available from the “hamburger” icon in the upper right of this (and every) page. An understanding of the purposes and principles of organization of this site will, I hope and believe, much augment your experience here, for this page and in general. You can simply click this link to get at the site front page, which, unsurprisingly, is the best place to start. Thank you for visiting.

The Riesling Grape


Quick page jumps:


About Riesling

(Synonyms: Beyaz Riesling, Johannisberg, Kleinriesling, Klingelberger, Lipka, Petit Rhin, Raisin Du Rhin, Rajinski Riesling, Renski Riesling, Renski Rizling, Rhein Riesling, Rheinriesling, Riesling Edler, Rielsing Gelb, Riesling Renano, Riesling Rhénan, Riesling Weisser, Risling, Rizling Rajnski, Ryzlink Rýnský, Starovetski, Weisser Riesling, White Riesling)

Background

Map showing the Rhine river.

Riesling is a white-wine grape originating in the Rhine Valley of Germany. Something that may surprise those whose acquaintance with the variety has been limited to inexpensive, over-sweet plonk is that Riesling is widely considered one of the dozen and a half or so “Noble wine grapes” of the world, and moreover was one of the original three white-wine grapes so designated (many think it the greatest white-wine grape of all). Despite that, it gets little respect in the U.S., being widely regarded as simply that too-common cheap, simple, sweet plonk.

The Riesling grape is naturally a very high-acid grape, which means that when properly vinified, it can not merely withstand bottle age, but continue to develop and improve, sometimes for many decades. The high acid, combined with high natural sugars, makes possible a very evenly-balanced wine, which can well display the rich and deep flavors also natural to the grape.

Riesling wines are typically highly aromatic, with complex and profound floral scents in the nose, which also appear in the taste. Moreover, it is a wine that is quite apt at displaying the much-prized quality of terroir (at least when respectfully vinified). Curiously, fine Rieslings also exhibit a quality commonly described as “petrol”, which does not sound at all appetizing but which somehow, in Rieslings, manages to be so (though some wine drinkers are so repelled by the idea that mention of it as a Riesling characteristic is being downplayed by makers, some of whom even strive to minimize or eliminate it, despite the harm they thereby do to the overall flavor, character, and age-worthiness of their wines).

Riesling is very rarely blended, and almost as rarely sees any oak (save occasionally some “neutral” oak). It is never made as a “woody” wine.

The biggest problem Riesling presents to the consumer is its sweetness: not how sweet it is or isn’t, but knowing how sweet it is or isn’t. Rieslings can be and are vinified everywhere from bone dry (especially in Alsatia) to dessert-sweet (many German wineries produce a veritable host of Riesling bottlings, differing chiefly in their sweetness), and it was long a problem for shoppers, even with a bottle in hand to inspect, to try to determine which sort they might be dealing with. Especially for Old World Rieslings is this difficult: Goethe famously remarked that “Life is too short to drink poor wine”, leading Martin Amis to wittily remark something to the effect that reading a German wine label is another thing life’s too short for. Fortunately, in recent years an organization called the International Riesling Foundation came up with a uniform sweetness-labelling scheme that now adorns many bottles of Riesling. Its essence is four levels of sweetness: Dry; Medium Dry; Medium Sweet; and Sweet. But if you encounter bottles not so labelled, here's a clue: look at the alcohol content. If the alcohol is 11% or under, the wine is definitely off dry; if it is 13% or above, the wine is dry; if it is from 11% to 13%, the sweetness is probably proportionately along the spectrum (“probably” because other factors influence the perception of sweetness in a wine).

(Recall that alcohol is produced by the fermentation of the sugars in the raw grape juice; the more alcohol there is in the final wine, the more of the original sugars that were fermented away. There is a good, detailed discussion of the sweetness of Rieslings at the German Wine Lover site, and another at the StarChefs site.)

Note that label notes other than those set forth by the IRF are chancey guides at best; many an American-made Riesling labelled “dry” would go best with the dessert course. Nor are the classic Germanic “ripeness” terms (Kabinett, Spätlese, Auslese, and so forth)—even if you memorize them—much help, because the ripeness only indicates the potential of the grapes: a given vintner can vinify a given lot of grape juice as he or she pleases, making (for example) a “Spätlese” that is actually drier than a “Kabinett”, though the Spätlese juice was originally higher in sugars. In the end, the consumer must, if there is no IRF mark available, go by the alcohol content and, ideally, by the reputation of the wine (which requires some foresight and study). Even if you have an appetite for all levels of sweetness, you still want to know which one you’re going to get on a given day.

Rieslings are today made all over the world, over a huge range of both style and quality. In the U.S., its history has been a sad one. An early flood of Rieslings, made simple and sweet and cheap, firmly planted the image of Riesling as a cheapo wine; today, winemakers who want to make wines that live up to the potential of the grape fight an uphill battle, because many consumers simply will not pay more than a few dollars for a bottle of “that cheap goop”. The tide is starting to turn, but progress so far is glacial. (Those of an age will recall the same thing having happened to the excellent noble grape Chenin Blanc.)

Riesling does well in cool climates, thriving where other “noble” grapes might struggle, and so has been popular in regions with limited climatic possibilities for wine. Probably the most important Riesling sources today are, more or less but not exactly in this order, Germany, the Alsace region of France, Austria, Australia and New Zealand, the U.S., and Canada, though those are far from all. There is no definite pattern associating style with region, but broadly speaking the middle-European makers tend to go for dry Rieslings, while new World makers tend to style a bit off dry. The regional wines also vary a deal owing to the differing soils in which they are grown, the wine being, as already noted, excellent at conveying terroir. Not many makers are producing the great Rieslings that want one or more decades of aging to approach their full potential, but there are probably more Alsatians of that sort than in the other regions.

If one relies on Wikipedia, these are (always painting with a very broad brush) the regional characteristics:

Again a caution: those are rough rules of thumb with, no doubt, countless exceptions.

Factoid: Riesling has its own producer society, the International Riesling Foundation, whose web site is a useful resource on the subject.

Return to the page top. ↑


Some Descriptions of Riesling Wines

Return to the page top. ↑


Some Riesling Bottlings to Try

(About this list.)

  Wines with a critics’ consensus score of 91:
Best's "Great Western" Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Forge Cellars "Classique" Dry Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Karl Erbes "Urziger Wurzgarten" Riesling Kabinett   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Pikes "Traditionale" Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]

  Wines with a critics’ consensus score of 90:
Hermann J. Wiemer Dry Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Jim Barry "The Lodge Hill" Dry Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]

  Wines with a critics’ consensus score of 89:
Chateau Ste. Michelle "Cold Creek Vineyard" Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Chateau Ste. Michelle & Dr. Loosen "Eroica" Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Dr. Konstantin Frank Dry Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
F. E. Trimbach Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Gunderloch "Jean Baptiste" Riesling Kabinett   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Hugel & Fils Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Selbach-Oster Riesling Kabinett   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
St. Urbans-Hof Nik Weis "From Old Vines" Estate Riesling   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]
Von Winning Riesling Trocken   [or search Cellar Tracker for this wine]

Return to the page top. ↑


If you have found that this site lives up to its name, “useful”, we would be grateful if you would post a link to it wherever you post on the internet—social media, websites, whatever—and also mention it to any wine-loving friends or co-workers. But, in any event, thanks for visiting!


Disclaimers  |  Privacy Policy


All content copyright © 2024 The Owlcroft Company
(excepting quoted material, which is believed to be Fair Use).

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!




This page was last modified on Friday, 20 December 2024, at 10:46 pm Pacific Time.